The paper is now 4 lines onto page 6. (now if it wasn’t for footnotes, it probally wouldn’t be that long but…) I think I am calling it quits for now.
It is odd though, the conclussion to me seems well rounded, th i>Freeing Theology bit flows well, conects in part to the intro and to the conclussion, though few textual references. The Intro, well, when I read it I feel about like how I felt the first few times I read parts of various works by Tillich, and then the Systematic Theology bit also feels similar to that, but also doesn’t seem to flow so well, and possibly misses the point I was trying to make, though uses more textual referense from the book than I did with Freeing Theology, though one thing there is I refer to that and the auuthores, but then focus only on one essay, and thus one author, and then sum up refering to that one author rather than the whole.
Beyond that, and the fact I still need to read through it againg to fix it, but am afraid to… its okay, I jsut hope it is close to what Mark Taylor wants, for otherwise I am in trouble.
(Left unedited for state of mind reasons)
— Lyle II